Establishing the Practicability of Organic Reaction Teaching Model in Minimizing Student’s Common Errors to Improve Academic Performance

Authors

Abdulmalik Sabitu, Othman Talib and Norizah Abdul Rahaman

Abstract

References

Abdurrahman Alkhaldi, I. A., Talib, O. B., Kamarudin, N. B., & Ab Jalil, H. (2020). Covid-19 and the Need for the use of Digital Game-based Learning for Teaching Mathematics at the Saudi Elementary Schools. Compusoft, 9(12), 3953-3959.

Abdullah, M. R. T. L., Siraj, S., Asra, & Hussin, Z. (2014). Interpretive Structural Modeling of Mlearning Curriculum Implementation Model of English Language Communication Skills for Undergraduates. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 151–161.

Ahmed, G., & Artosh, M. (2016). Development of a Higher Order Thinking Teaching Model for Basic Education Students in Science. In Thsesis Doctor of Philosophy. University Malaya, Malaysia.

Akaygun, S. (2016). Is the Oxygen Atom Static or Dynamic? The Effect of Generating Animations on Students’ Mental Models of Atomic Structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 788- 807. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00067C

Ali, W. (2020). Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16

Altschuld, J. W., & Hines, C. V. (1982). Factors Affecting the Validity of Field Tests in Education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(3), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737004003331

Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A Comparative Analysis of Models of Instructional Design. Journal of instructional development, 3(4), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904348

Azraai, O. (2016). Modeling Relationships of Matriculation Students’ Affective and Cognitive Factors and Achievement in Organic Chemistry. In Universitas Putra Malaysia. University Putra Malaysia

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction. 6th. New York: Longmann.

Dutt, A., Tan, M., Alagumalai, S., & Nair, R. (2019). Development and Validation of the Ability in Behavior Assessment and Interventions for Teachers Using Delphi Technique and Rasch Analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(5), 1976–1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03887-4

Deldjoo, Y., Anelli, V. W., Zamani, H., Bellogin, A., & Di Noia, T. (2021). A flexible Framework for Evaluating User and Item Fairness in Recommender Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-020-09285-1

Dejene, W. (2019). The Practice of Modularized Curriculum in Higher Education Institution: Active Learning and Continuous Assessment in Focus. Cogent Education, 6(1), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052

Djoko Dwiyogo, W. & LigyaRadjah, C. (2020). Effectiveness, Efficiency and Instruction Appeal of Blended Learning Model. International Association of OnlineEngineering. Retrieved October 12, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217970/.

Englander, M. (2016). The Interview: Data collection in Descriptive Phenomenological Human Scientific Research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 47(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632943

Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning Models in Science Education and in Design and Technology Education. Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 3-17). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1

Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is Instructional Design. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 2, 10-16.

Kristiono, I. D., Dwiyogo, W. D., & Hariadi, I. (2019). Sports Nutrition Science Learning Based on Blended Learning in Physical Education, Health, and Recreation Students. Journal of Education:Theory, Research, and Development, 4 (2), 235-241.

Lim, J. E., Wong, W. T., Teh, T. A., Lim, S. H., Allen Jr, J. C., Quah, J. H. M., & Tan, N. C. (2021). A Fully-Immersive and Automated Virtual Reality System to Assess the Six Domains of Cognition: Protocol for a Feasibility Study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.604670

Mama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2013). Developing a Typology of Teacher Beliefs and Practices Concerning Classroom Use of ICT. Computers & Education, 68, 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.022

Muqsith, A., Zaharah, Farazila, A., Yusof, H., & Mohd Ridhuan, J. (2017). Nominal Group Technique (NGT) And Its Application To The Construction Of Ethical Elements and Values (Morals) Based on Inquiry Activities in Polytechnics and Community Colleges. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 125-145

Nworgu, C., & Oluwuo, S. O. (2019). Time Resource Management and Teachers’ Task Performance in Public Senior Secondary Schools in Rivers State. International Journal of Education and Evaluation, 5(6), 36-48.

Ragan, T. J., Smith, P. L., & Curda, L. K. (2008). Outcome- Referenced, Conditions-Based Theories and Models. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3, 383-399.

Ridhuan, M. B. M. J. (2016). Development of Skives Training Curriculum Model for Work -Based Learning Engineering Study Program. In Thsesis Doctor of Philosophy. University Malaya, Malaysia.

Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. J. (1987). What happens in high school science Classrooms? Journal of Curriculum studies, 19(6), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190606

Tracey, M. W., & Richey, R. C. (2007). ID Model Construction and Validation: A Multiple Intelligences Case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(4), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9015-4

Umoren, G., & Ogong, A. S. (2007). Prior presentation of Behavioral Objectives and Students’ Achievement in Biology. Educational Research and Reviews, 2(2), 022-025

Uzunboylu, H., & Kosucu, E. (2017). Comparison and Evaluation of Seels& Glasgow and Addie Instructional Design Model. Ponte, 73(6), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2017.6.37

Wong, K. K. H., & Day, J. R. (2009). A comparative study of problem-based and lecture-based learning in junior secondary school science. Research in Science Education, 39(5), 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9096-7

How to Cite