Millennials in Higher Education: Do They Really Learn Differently

Published: April 18, 2022


  • Dr Preeti GoyalDeptt. Finance and Accounting, Great Lakes Institute of Management, Gurgaon
  • Poornima Gupta
goal orientation, learning affectivity, learning attributes, higher education, Millennials, Gen X, Competition


Background: Effective skill development remains an important vehicle for national prosperity. Aswhat appeared to work with their predecessor generation (Gen X) does not have the same results with Millennials many educators today are experimenting with pedagogies to effectively train Millennials. Globally, it is becoming evident that the Millennials in higher education learn very differently than their predecessors.

Purpose: Our study provides comparisons on three learning parameters of learning affectivity, goal orientation and competition between Gen X & Millennials..

Methods: To study whether the learning attributes are similar or they differ across the two generations we compared the means of the three attributes under consideration. Results: We find Millennials to be different from Gen X across the three studied parameters suggesting that teaching pedagogies require a rethink for Millennials.

Conclusions: These results could be useful in designing appropriate teaching pedagogies that are likely to improve Millennials’ learning.


AISHE (2020), AISHE Report 2018-19, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Accessed from on August 30th, 2021

Alexander C.S., Sysko J.M. (2013). I’m Gen Y, I Love Feeling Entitled, and It Shows. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(4), 127-131.

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 261-271.

Ames, C., Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.

Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., Gonçalves, R., Martins, J., & Branco, F. (2018). The social impact of technology on Millennials and consequences for higher education and leadership.

Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 954-963.

Baldwin, T. T., Magjuka, R. J., &Loher, B. T. (1991). The perils of participation: Effects of choice of training on training motivation and learning. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 51-65.

Beard, C., Clegg, S. and Smith, K. (2007). Acknowledging the affective in higher education, British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 235-52.

Beenen G. (2014). The Effects of Goal Orientations and Supervisor Concerns on MBA Intern Learning and Performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 82-101.

Belenky D. M. &Nokes-Malach T. J. (2012) Motivation and Transfer: The Role of Mastery-Approach Goals in Preparation for Future Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(3), 399-432.

Bledow, R., Carette, B., Kühnel, J., &Bister, D. (2017). Learning from others’ failures: The effectiveness of failure stories for managerial learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(1), 39-53.

Box, J. F. (1981). Gosset, Fisher, and the t distribution. The American Statistician, 35(2), 61-66.

Chapman, J. R. and Rich, P. (2015), January. The Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Gamification Platform for Business Education. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 11477). Academy of Management.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.

Chung, S., Zhan, Y., Noe, R. A., & Jiang, K. (2021). Is it time to update and expand training motivation theory? A meta-analytic review of training motivation research in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Psychology.

Clark C. S., Dobbins G. H., Ladd R. T. (1993). Exploratory field study of training motivation: Influence of involvement, credibility, and transfer climate. Group & Organization Management, 18, 292-307.

Cogin, J. (2012). Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(11), 2268–2294.

D’Amato, A., & Baruch, Y. (2020). Cultural and generational predictors of learning goal orientation: A multilevel analysis of managers across 20 countries. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(2), 159-179.

De Lange P., Suwardy T., Mavondo F. (2003). Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: determinants of student motivation. Accounting Education, 12(1), 1-14.

Deterding S., Sicart M., Nacke L., O’Hara K., Dixon D. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, Finland.

Deutsch M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152.

Dweck, C. S. and Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

Elliot A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.

Erhel S., Jamet E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers and Education, 67, 156-167.

Feiertag, J. and Berge, Z.L. (2008). Training Generation N: how educators should approach the Net Generation. Education+Training, 50(6), 457-464.

Gertsakis, N., Kroustallaki, D., &Sideridis, G. D. (2021). How do classroom goal structures matter? The impact on grammar achievement, perceived autonomy support, flow, and affect. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(2), 172-188.

Gupta, P., & Goyal, P. (2018). Gen Y Attributes— Antecedents to Teaching Pedagogy. Vision, 22(1), 78-87.

Gursoy, D., Maier, T. A., & Chi, C. G. (2008). Generational differences: An examination of work values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. (3), 448-458.

Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., &Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(C), 101-110.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., &Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems.

Hershatter, A. and Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 211-223.

Hicks, W. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1987). Entry into training programs and its effects on training outcomes: A field experiment. Academy of management journal, 30(3), 542-552.

Hopkins, L., Hampton, B. S., Abbott, J. F., Buery-Joyner, S. D., Craig, L. B., Dalrymple, J. L., … & Wolf, A. (2018). To the point: medical education, technology, and the millennial learner. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 218(2), 188-192.

Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (2009). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage.

Jindal, V., & Jaiswall, M. (2015). Board diversity and firm performance influenced by ownership concentration: Evidence from India. Indian Institute of Management Calcutta Working Paper Series, WPS No. 765 July 2015.

Johnson D.W., & Johnson R. (1983). The socialization and achievement crisis: Are cooperative learning experiences the solution? in L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual 4, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 119–164.

Johnson, S.A. and Romanello, M.L. (2005). Generational diversity: Teaching and learning approaches. Nurse educator, 30(5), 212-216.

Jonas-Dwyer, D. and Pospisil, R. (2004). The millennial effect: Implications for academic development. In Proceedings of the 2004 annual international conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) (pp. 356-366).

Kozlowski S. W., Bell B. S. (2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 900–916.

Lee F., Sheldon K. M., Turban D. E. (2003). Personality and the goal-striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 256–265.

Lee, H. W. (2019). Moderators of the motivational effects of performance management: A comprehensive exploration based on expectancy theory. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 27-55.

Linnenbrink E. A., Pintrich P. R. (2002). Achievement goals theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 27(2), 69-78.

Linnenbrink E. A. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. In P.A. & P. Reinhard (eds.), Emotion in Education, San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 107-124.

Mathieu J. E., Tannenbaum S. I., Salas E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 828-847.

Mehta, R. (2020). Gender-based differences in consumer decision-making styles: implications for marketers. Decision 47(3), 319–329.

Noe R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736-749.

Nunnally J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers gen-xers Millennials. EDUCAUSE review, 500(4), 37-47.

Pelton L. E., True S. L. (2004). Teaching Business Ethics, Why Millennials? Marketing Education Review, 14, 6370.

Prensky M. (2001). Digital game based learning, New York: McGraw Hill. Putz, L. M., Hofbauer, F., &Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Can gamification help to improve education? Findings from a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106392.

Raines, C. (2002). Managing Millennials. Connecting Generations: The Sourcebook. Reeves, T. C., & Oh, E. (2008). Generational differences. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3, 295-303.

Reilly, P. (2012). Understanding and Teaching Generation Y. In English teaching forum (Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 2-11). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5, 2200 C Street NW 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20037.

Sojka J. Z., Fish M. S. B. (2013). Brief In-Class Role Plays: An Experiential Teaching Tool Targeted To Generation Y Students. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 25-31.

Stukalina Y. (2014). Identifying Predictors of Student Satisfaction And Student Motivation In The Framework Of Assuring Quality In The Delivery Of Higher Education Services. Business, Management and Education, 12(1), 127-37.

Tannenbaum S. I., Mathieu J. E., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759-769.

Tetteh G. A. (2015). Assessing indicators of motivation for learning in a TQM class. TQM Journal, 27(4), 412-434.

Urdan, T., & Kaplan, A. (2020). The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101862.

Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 44(1), 119-134.

Warmelink, H., Koivisto, J., Mayer, I., Vesa, M., & Hamari, J. (2020). Gamification of production and logistics operations: Status quo and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 106, 331–340.

Weiner, B. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action, Guilford Press. Yahr, M. A., & Schimmel, K. (2013). Comparing Current Students to a Pre-Millennial Generation: Are They Really Different?Research in Higher Education Journal, 20.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

Zaphiris P., Ang C. S., Law D. (2007). Individualistic Versus Competitive Game-Based E-Learning. Advanced Technology for Learning, 4(4), 1-6.

How to Cite

Dr Preeti Goyal, Poornima Gupta. Millennials in Higher Education: Do They Really Learn Differently. Issues Ideas Edu. 2022, 10, 1-12
Millennials in Higher Education: Do They Really Learn Differently

Current Issue

ISSN Print2320-7655
ISSN Online2320-8805
RNI No.CHAENG/2013/49611
OA Policy

Publisher's policy of the journal at Sherpa UK for the submitted, accepted, and published articles. Click OAPolicy

Plan-S Compliance

To check compliance, one has to use the Journal Check Tool (JCT). This tool provided by cOAlition S (European funders) for the researchers (fundee) to check the compliance with the journal.

Recommend journal to your library

You can recommend the journal being a researcher or faculty member to your library. We will post a copy of the Journal to your library on your behalf at free of cost.
Click here: Recommend Journal

Preprint Arxiv Submission

The authors are encouraged to submit the author’s copy (preprint) to appropriate preprint archives e.g. and/or on or institutional repositories (e.g., D Space) before paper acceptance by the editor of Journal. After publications of the paper author(s) should mention the citation information, title and abstract along with DOI number of the publication carefully on the required page of the depository(ies).


Phone: +91-172-2741000, +91-172-4691800
Email :

Abstract and Indexing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in Journal of Issues and Ideas in Education (Issues Ideas Educ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.

View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license,

View Licence Deed here

Creative Commons License

Journal of Issues and Ideas in Education by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at