Effect of Online Learning in Psychology course on Undergraduate students’ Engagement in Learning
Authors
- Ambalika DograPh.D Scholar, Department of Education, Panjab university, Chandigarh
- Sunil DuttProfessor, Education & Educational Management, National Institute of technical teachers training and research, Chandigarh
Keywords
Online learning, traditional learning
Abstract
The paper has analyzed the effect of online learning and traditional mode of learning on students’ engagement in learning. A sample of 50 students studying psychology in their B.A course was selected randomly from one college in Chandigarh. An online learning course in selected topics of psychology was developed. The experimental group of the study was exposed through online learning mode for 15 days. Likewise, control group was taught the same content by traditional learning for 15 days as well. Both the groups were controlled on same instructional design model such as ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation), same number of participants, same content was employed for teaching and they were both matched on pre-test of engagement in learning. The students’ post-test scores on engagement in learning was analyzed using t-test to determine if there were significant differences between the two groups. Results indicated significant differences between online learning and traditional learning on students’ engagement in learning as students taught by online learning were more engaged in learning than students who were taught by traditional learning. It indicates that learning through online does enhance students’ engagement in learning.
References
- Bulger, M.E., Mayer, R.E., Almeroth, K.C. & Blau, S.D.(2008). Measuring learner engagement in a computer-equipped college classroom. JI of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(2), 129-143. retrieved January 5, 2014, from http://scholar.google.co.in
- Carini, R. M., Kuh, G.D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages. research in Higher Education, 47 (1), 1-32. retrieved on March 2, 2014.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
- Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8 (13). retrieved December 26, 2013, from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=13
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 72 (1), 59-109. retrieved October 15, 2013, from http://rer.sagepub.com/content/74/1/59.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Junco, R., Heibergert, G., & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,1-14. retrieved January 5, 2014, from www.ferris.edu/htmls/administration/…/StudentEngagementArticle.pdf; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
- Kuh, G.D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50 (6), 683-706. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0099.retrieved October 15, 2014, from https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_college_student_development/summary/v050/50.6.kuh.html
- Lerma, M. D. P. (2011). Student engagement in online learning at the community college level. (Doctoral dissertation). retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (AAt 3472523)
- Lynch, r., & Dembo, M. (2004). the relationship between self-regulation and online learning a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). retrieved November 10, 2013, from http://www.irrodl.org/indes.php/irrodl/article/view/189/799
- Murphy, C. A., & Stewart, J. C. (2015). the impact of online or F2F lecture choice on student achievement and engagement in a large lecture-based science course: closing the gap. Online Learning Journal, 19(3), retrieved July 12, 2015, from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/536
- Neumann, D. l., & Hood, M. (2009). the effects of using wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in a university statistics course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 382-398. retrieved January 6, 2014, from www.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/…/59677_1.pdf
- Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M. & Govind, R. (2013). Increasing student engagement using asynchronous learning. Journal of Marketing Education. doi:10.1177/027347531558981. retrieved November 29, 2015, from http://jmd.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/06/03/0273475315589814.abstract
- Sbrocco, r. (2009). Student academic engagement and the academic achievement gap between black and white middle school students: does engagement increase student achievement? (Doctoral dissertation). retrieved January 5, 2014, from conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/…/1/Sbrocco_umn_0130E_10755.pdf
- Schreiner, l.A. & Louis, M.C. (2006). Measuring engaged learning in college students: beyond the borders of NSSE, pp.1-30. retrieved January 5, 2014, from https://www.apu.edu/…/downloads/measuring_engaged_learning08.pdf
- The Department of Education, Michigan. (2006). Online experience [Document]. retrieved November 2, 2013 from http://search.michigan.gov/search?affiliate=mi-mde&query=online learning, 2006
- The Department of Education, U.S. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies [report]. retrieved November 2, 2013 from http://find.ed.gov/search?q=ONlINE+lEArNINg%2C+2010&client=default_frontend&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=default_frontend&site=default_collection&sa.x=18&sa.y=9
How to Cite
Ambalika Dogra, Sunil Dutt. Effect of Online Learning in Psychology course on Undergraduate students’ Engagement in Learning.
Issues Ideas Educ.. 2016, 04, 21-28
