Investigation of Undergraduate Physics Students’ Conception of Eclipses’ Formation Using Three Tiers Diagnostic Test in Ilorin, Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Natural phenomenon explanation like eclipse is an important event that needs to be examined among all peers so as to ensure the scientific understanding of these natural happenings in our various environments.

Purpose: This study focuses on investigating the undergraduate physics students’ conception of eclipses formation using a three-tier diagnostic test.

Method: The study was descriptive research of survey type that adopted the usage of a three-tier questionnaire to elicit information about the students’ understanding of eclipses formation. The sample of the study consisted of 80 students (40 physics education students and 40 pure physics students), who were selected through convenience sampling technique. The three-tier diagnostic test consisted of four questions that were on the formation of total solar eclipse, annular solar eclipse, partial solar eclipse, and lunar eclipse, which was used to collect information. Each question consisted of three stages. Descriptive statistics like frequency count, percentage, and pie chart were used to determine the students’ correct conception, misconception, wrong conception, and guess answer

Results: The study found out that 20 students had correct conception, while 42 had misconception of the formation of total solar eclipse.

Conclusion: The study recommended that the study on students’ correct conception and misconception about the natural phenomenon should be carried out often.

  • Page Number : 26-33

  • Published Date : 2025-11-24

  • Keywords
    Physics student, Eclipse, Three tiers diagnostic test, Misconception

  • DOI Number
    10.15415/iie.2025.131003

  • Authors
    Wasiu Olayinka Yahaya, Abubakar Salman Abdulkadir, Abdulrazaq Shehu, and Abdulrasaq Oladimeji Akanbi

References

  • Desfandi, M., Abdi, A., Gadeng, A., & Sofia, I. (2020). Identification of misconceptions in geography using the three-tier diagnostic test. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 561(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/561/1/012040
  • Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2021). Students’ reactions to natural and physical phenomena: Documenting wonder and engagement with science content knowledge. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340
  • Hewitt, K. (1970). Probabilistic approaches to discrete natural events: A review and theoretical discussion. Economic Geography, 46(4), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.2307/143148
  • Kiroglu, K., Turk, C., & Erdogan, I. (2019). Which one is more effective in teaching the phases of the moon and eclipses: Hands-on or computer simulation? Research in Science Education, 51, 733–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9815-7
  • Milenkovic, D., Hrin, T., Segedinac, M., & Horvat, S. (2016). Development of a three-tier test as a valid diagnostic tool for identification of misconceptions related to carbohydrates. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1514–1520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00261
  • Pramesti, Y. S., Mahmudi, H., & Setyowidodo, I. (2021). Using three-tier test to diagnose students’ level of understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012013
  • Rutgersson, A., Kjellström, E., Haapala, J., Stendel, M., Danilovich, I., Drews, M., Jylhä, K., Kujala, P., Larsen, X., Halsnæs, K., Lehtonen, I., Luomaranta, A., Nilsson, E., Olsson, T., Särkkä, J., Tuomi, L., & Wasmund, N. (2021). Natural hazards and extreme events in the Baltic Sea region. Earth System Dynamics, 13, 251–301. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-13
  • Scheibe, E. (1991). General laws of nature and the uniqueness of the universe. In The Philosophy of Nature (pp. 341–360). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3598-6_10
  • Schlottman, A., & Anderson, N. (1993). An information integration approach to phenomena causality. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202746
  • Semercioglu, M. G., & Kalkan, H. (2021). Understanding of teachers on phases of the moon and lunar eclipse. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 102–131. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i2.3555
  • Slater, T. F., & Gelderman, R. (2018). Addressing students’ misconceptions about eclipses. The Physics Teacher, 56(5), 314–315. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5028254
  • Suprapto, N., Deta, U. A., Lestari, N. A., Kholiq, A., Adam, A. S., Mubarok, H., & Jauhariyah, M. N. R. (2018). Pre-service physics teachers’ understanding on total lunar eclipse: A response to the supermoon on January 31st, 2018. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 012097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012097
  • Yu, M. (2020). A graph-based spatiotemporal data framework for 4D natural phenomena representation and quantification—An example of dust events. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020127