Sustenance of Autonomy in Higher Education Institutions

Abstract

Background: The higher education institutions will achieve autonomy traversing the path of graded accreditation. The autonomy of higher education is linked with the quality of education and accreditation. Higher education institutions will not only achieve autonomy but will sustain it in ever-changing external and internal environments.

Purpose: The purpose is to design strategies for the sustenance of autonomy in higher education institutions.

Method: The paper is based on an exploratory qualitative study conducted during 2020. The research objectives emanate from the review of the literature and the experiences of the researcher. The research objective is further explored from the literature review to formulate the research questions.The population for the study constitutes the autonomous higher education institutions of the country including engineering, management, pharmacy, and polytechnic institutions.  The researcher selected a purposive sample to gather the information and views of the respondents. Respondents were selected from all over India, all types of institutions, and all levels of the institute. The researcher designed a comprehensive, concise, precise, and accurate structured and semi-structured research instrument based on the literature, experiences, and focus group discussion. This research instrument was validated on content and construct in a group of six persons working in the area of autonomy. Then it was prepared in the Google form which was validated by forty respondents. The respondents are principals, heads of departments, senior faculty members working in national-level institutes, higher education institutes, and technical institutions.The instrument was mailed to more than 8000 respondents out of which 954 respondents provided information. The information is provided by principals, deans, heads of departments, and senior faculty members. Secondary information is also used to fill up the gap to achieve the research objective. The information received from structured instruments is compiled using Microsoft Excel Sheet to calculate the weighted mean and percentage.

Results: The strategies for sustaining autonomy at central government, state government, regulatory body, institute, teacher, and student levels are evolved.

Conclusion: To reap the full potential of autonomy and its sustenance strategies at different levels of hierarchy need to be effectively implemented on continuous basis.

  • Page Number : 1–13

  • Published Date : 2023-03-06

  • Keywords
    NEP 2020, Sustenance of autonomy, Strategies for the sustenance of autonomy

  • DOI Number
    10.15415/iie.2023.111001

  • Authors
    B. L. Gupta

References

  • Brock, D. M. (2003). Autonomy of Individuals and Organizations: Towards a Strategy Research Agenda. International Journal of Business and Economics, 2(1), 57-73.
  • Currie, J. H. (2004). Accountability in Higher Education: Bridge Over Troubled Water? Higher Education, 48, 529-551.
  • Frankowski, A. (2018). Dilemmas of Central Governance and Distributed Autonomy in Education, OECD Education Working Paper. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • Gandhi, M. (2013). Autonomy and Accountability in Higher Education An Indian Perspective. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 3(5), 33-37.
  • Gustavo Arcia, (2011). School Autonomy and Accountability. System Assessment and Benchmarking for Education Results.
  • Julia Iwinska, (2019). University Autonomy - A Practical Handbook. Central European University, Budapest, Hungry.
  • Sankaran, (2016). Autonomy for Excellence in Higher Education. NITTE Management Review, 1-10.
  • Kai, R. (2013). Academic Freedom and Institutional Autonomy: A Higher Education Policy Perspective. Higher Education Policy, 26(4), 507-522.
  • Kiran Devade,(2013). Structure of Autonomy in Technical Education: Propositions. 43rd ISTE National Convention. Indian Society for Technical Education, New Delhi.
  • Luis Velazquez (2005). Deterring Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions, An Appraisal of the Factors which Influence Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 383-391.
  • Martin, Michaela. (2013). Increased Autonomy for Universities in Asia: How to Make it Work? International Institute for Educational Planning, United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization.
  • Martinez, F. M. (2018). Excellence of Universities versus Autonomy, Accountability, Funding and Accountability. European Review, 26(S1), S48-S56.
  • MHRD. (2005). Autonomy of Higher Education Institutions. Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India.
  • MHRD. (2020). National Education Policy. Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India.
  • Nikhitha Mary Mathew, (2016). Autonomous Colleges in Kerala: An Evaluative Study. Centre for Public Policy Research.
  • Nokkala, T. E. (2009). University Autonomy in Europe I. Europian University Association.
  • Pondhe, M. (2016). Autonomy as a Structural Solution for Quality Improvement. International Journal of Educational Research Studies, 1(5), 327-333.
  • Pooja Sharma, (2017). Inclination Towards Autonomy in Higher Education: A Conceptual Framework. Imperical Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(4), 1093-1097.
  • Rahul Deo, (2014). A Study of Student Satisfaction in Autonomous and Non-Autonomous Institutes in Indore City. Prestige e-Journal of Management and Research, 1(1), 1-8.
  • Sandhu, R. (2015). Autonomy and Accountability in Higher Education. International Journal of Research in IT, Management and Engineering, 5(1), 15-22.
  • Thomas Estermann, (2011). University Autonomy in Europe II, The Scorecard. European University Association.
  • UGC. (2018). Guidelines for Autonomous Colleges. University Grants Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.
  • Verdenhofa, O. (2016). University Autonomy. Economics and Education, 1(1), 19-22.