Use of Multimedia in Punjabi Learning System Design

Abstract

In this technology era, students are becoming more efficient in coursework because of a better understanding of the subject materials due to the availability of multimedia packages that make teaching-learning an interesting process. In India, the scope of regional languages is limited only to their regions. Hence, more emphasis has been put on the use of Multimedia to develop the mother tongue. The development of instructional material using Multimedia in the Punjabi Language will help the teachers to procure and use these packages in classroom teaching, to make teaching interesting. Also, this will help the teachers to make a shift from traditional methods of teaching to new computerized methods. Due to this, students will able to retain the concepts for a long time as these methods have proved very effective in other courses too. Furthermore, films and print media also have a great contribution towards the technical teaching of these languages to promote the usage of regional languages at the National and International Level.

  • Page Number : 183-189

  • Published Date : 2018-09-03

  • Keywords
    Multimedia Packages, Traditional Learning, Computer Based Learning, Punjabi Language, Learning Punjabi, Multimedia Ideas

  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2018.62013

  • Authors

    • NeelamCollege of Education, Chitkara University, Punjab, India

References

  • Husbands, C. (2011). Facilitating effective student learning through teacher research and innovation, Teacher Development, Taylor & Francis, 401–402.
  • Aspray, W. (2016) Recent Efforts to Broaden Formal Computer Science Education at the K-12 Level Participation in Computing, Springer.
  • A. A. (2016). Five Powerful Ideas About Technology and Education New Developments in Science and Technology Education, Springer.
  • Abdullah, R. B. B. (2016). Inculcation of Malay Values and Culture in Language Pedagogy in Singapore Quadrilingual Education in Singapore, Springer.
  • Ahmad, M.; Rahim, L. A. & Arshad, N. I. (2015). A multi-domain framework: A qualitative study evolving understanding of subject-matter in modelling educational games Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), International Symposium, 384–389.
  • Akhtar, S. A.; Warburton, S. & Xu, (2013).W. Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Interactive System to Support CAD Teaching Multimedia (ISM), IEEE International Symposium, 480–485.
  • Ames, C. and Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of educational psychology, American Psychological Association, 80, 260.
  • Bidwell, N. J. (2016). Moving the centre to design social media in rural Africa AI & SOCIETY, Springer 51.
  • Beynon, M. and Roe, C. (2004). Computer support for constructionism in context Advanced Learning Technologies, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference 216-220.
  • Basak, H. H. and Ozansoy, K. (2012). Comparison of traditional over WEB-Based Education: Case study “Adobe Flash “Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), International Conference, 1–8.
  • Banu, R. K. and Ravanan, R (2011). Analysis of e-learning in data mining --- A dreamed vision for empowering rural students in India Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), International Conference, 1265–1270.
  • Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. ERIC.Bryant, D. P.;
  • Bryant, B. R. & Smith, D. D. (2016). Teaching students with special needs in inclusive classrooms SAGE Publications.
  • Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. ERIC.
  • Cardia, N.; Alves, R.; Gomes, A. and Mourão, A. (2016). Home Visitation Programs for Early Child Development: Experiences in Latin America and the Caribbean Home Visitation Programs, Springer.
  • Chamot, A. U. & Kupper, L (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction Foreign language annals, Wiley Online Library, 13–22.
  • Copeland, L. & Gedeon, T. (2015). Tutorials in eLearning; How Presentation Affects Outcomes IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, PP .1
  • Deng, W. (2014). The English learning system design based on the Android platform Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA), IEEE Workshop, 777–780.
  • English, K. (2011). Teaching students with special needs in general education classrooms.
  • Hendricks, C. C. (2016). Improving schools through action research Pearson.
  • Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies Routledge.
  • Lewis, R. B.; Wheeler, J. J. and Carter, S. L. (2016). Teaching students with special needs in general education classrooms Pearson.
  • Misra, R.; Srivastava, S. and Abeles, T. (2016). M-education in India: an effort to improve educational outcomes with a special emphasis on Ananya Bihar On the Horizon, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 24.
  • Okamoto, T. (2000). RAPSODY: distance ecological model for self- and collaborative-learning Advanced Learning Technologies. IWALT, Proceedings. International Workshop 249–250.
  • Pintrich, P.R. and De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, American Psychological Association, 82, 33
  • Ponnuswamy, I. and Manohar, H. L. (2016). Impact of learning organization culture on performance in higher education institutions Studies in Higher Education, Taylor & Francis, 41, 21–36
  • Stamovlasis, D. (2016). Catastrophe Theory: Methodology, Epistemology, and Applications in Learning Science Complex Dynamical Systems in Education, Springer.
  • Zoller, U. (2016). From Algorithmic Science Teaching to “Know” to Research-Based Transformative Inter-Transdisciplinary Learning to “Think”: Problem Solving in the STES/STEM and Sustainability Contexts Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning, Springer.