A Study on The Attitude of Secondary School Teachers of West Bengal Towards CLIL

Abstract

Cognitive development goes hand in hand with linguistic development, and language emerges as a tool through which a learner comes to understand the world. In the first language these processes are paired naturally, though for second language learners like the majority of learners of English in India, traditional methods for teaching second/foreign languages often dissociate language learning from cognitive or academic development. By contrast, an integrated approach brings these domains together in instruction. Integration of language and content, commonly known as CLIL, therefore emerges as significant for effective education. However, though the West Bengal Elementary Teacher Education Curriculum Framework encourages? CLIL, there seems to be a significant knowledge gap among practising secondary and higher secondary teachers regarding language and content integrated teaching and learning. The present study seeks to explore the knowledge and attitude of teachers of West Bengal regarding the CLIL methodology.

  • Page Number : 185-198

  • Published Date : 2017-11-06

  • Keywords
    Content, Language, Integration, CLIL, Teacher attitude, Knowledge, Teacher education

  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2017.52012

  • Authors

    • Piku ChowdhurySatyapriya Roy College of Education, Kolkata

References

  • Anderson, J. R., Eisenberg, N., Holland, J., Weiner, H. S., with Rivera- Kron, C.(1983). Integrated skills reinforcement: Reading, writing, speaking, and listening across the curriculum. New York: Longman.
  • Cantoni-Harvey, G. (1987). Content-area language instruction: Approaches and strategies. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Chamot, A.U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227–p.?
  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Mohan, B. M. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
  • Nhan, T. (2013) ‘Promoting Content and Language Integrated Learning in Gifted High Schools in Vietnam: Challenges and Impacts’, Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society38: 146–53
  • Short, D. J. (1991). How to integrate language and content instruction: A training manual (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics
  • Smala, Simone (2013). “Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)Pedagogies in Queensland”. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning.8, Issue: 3
  • Thuy, Linh Nguyen Thi (2016) “Reconsidering the First Steps of CLIL Implementation in Vietnam”, | European Journal of Language Policy.