Predictors of Attitude of College Students Towards use of Computers
Keywords:use of computers, computer related anxiety, computer related self-efficacy, college students
The study focused on exploring predictors of attitude of college students towards use of computers. t he data were collected from 300 government and private degree college students of s angrur district of p unjab. t he results of correlation analysis revealed negative and significant relationship of attitude of college students towards use of computers with computer related anxiety. t he results revealed significant and positive relationship of attitude of college students towards use of computers with computer related self-efficacy. Further, negative and significant relationship between computer related anxiety and computer related self-efficacy among college students was reported. Computer related anxiety emerged as the most significant predictor of attitude of college students towards use of computers. t hese results of the study have implications for counsellors, teachers and parents.
Adebowale, O. F., Adediwura, A. A., & Bada, A. A. (2009). Correlates of computer attitude among secondary school students in Lagos state, Nigeria. International Journal of Computing and ICT research, 3(2), 20-30.
Bandura, A. (1986). social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: prentice-hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Worth Publishers.
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). the impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer-assisted Learning, 14(3), 223-234.http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.1998.143059.x
Brown, I., & Inouye, D. (1978). Learned helplessness through modelling: the role of the perceived similarity incompetence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 36, 900-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.520
Busch, T. (1995). gender differences in self-efficacy and attitude toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/h7E1-XMM7-gu9B-3hWr
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249688
Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, s. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249749
Delcourt, M. A. B., & Kinzie, M. B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: the measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(1), 35-41.Durndell, A., Haag, Z., & Laithwaite, H. (2000). Computer self efficacy and gender: a cross-cultural study of Scotland and Romania. personality and Individual Differences, 28, 1037-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00155-5
Embi, r. (2007). Computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy among accounting educators at universiti teknologi Mara (UITM), Malaysia. ph.D. thesis in Career and Technical Education, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and state university, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Harrington, K. V., McElroy, J. C., & Morrow, p. C. (1990). Computer anxiety and computer-based training: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 343-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/34Q7-0hhF-8JDL-Dr09
Hasan, B. (2003). the influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 443-450.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00079-1
Heinssen, R. K., glass, C. R. & Knight, L. A. (1987). assessing computer anxiety: Development of validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behaviour, 3, 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0
Herdman, P. C. (1983). High tech anxiety. Management Focus, 30(3), 29-31.
Howard, G. S., & Smith, R. D. (1986). Computer anxiety in management: Myth or reality? Communication of the ACM, 29(7), 611-615.http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/6138.6143
Johnson, R. D. (2005). an empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy-performance relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 737-758.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.02.008
Khorrami-Arani, O. (2001). Researching computer self-efficacy. International Education Journal, 2(4), 17-25.
Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). the multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information systems research, 9(2), 126-163.http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.126
Murphy, C.S., Coover, D., & Owen, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49,893-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316448904900412
Nickell, G. S., & Pinto, J.N. (1986). The computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behaviour, 2, 301-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(86)90010-5
Paxton, A. L., & Turner, E. J. (1984). the application of human factors to the needs of novice computer users. International Journal of Man-Machine studies, 20, 137-156.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7373(84)80014-0
Potosky, D. (2002). A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(3), 241-255.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00050-4
Roslan, S., & Mun, T. C. (2005). Relationships between sources and dimensions of computer anxiety. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional technology, 2(2),41-49.
Sam, H. K., Othman, A.E.A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety and attitudes toward the internet: a study among undergraduates in unimas. Educational technology and society, 8(4), 205-219.
Simsek, A. (2011). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational technology, 2(3), 177-187.
Teo, T. (2008). pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: a Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational technology, 24(4), 413-424.
Torkzadeh, G., & Angulo, I. E. (1992). the concept and correlates of computer anxiety. Behavior and Information technology, 11, 99-108.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449299208924324
Torkzadeh, G., & Koufteros, X. (1994). Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 813-921.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054003028
Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1995). the psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: a study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty three countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 95-133.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(94)00026-E
Whitrow, T. J. (1999). Integrating computers across the curriculum: students’ computer-related attitude changes. B.Ed. honours thesis in Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
How to Cite
Articles in Journal of Issues and Ideas in Education (Issues Ideas Educ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://iie.chitkara.edu.in. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.
View Legal Code of the above mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
|Journal of Issues and Ideas in Education by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://iie.chitkara.edu.in