Millennials in Higher Education: Do They Really Learn Differently
Keywords:goal orientation, learning affectivity, learning attributes, higher education, Millennials, Gen X, Competition
Background: Effective skill development remains an important vehicle for national prosperity. Aswhat appeared to work with their predecessor generation (Gen X) does not have the same results with Millennials many educators today are experimenting with pedagogies to effectively train Millennials. Globally, it is becoming evident that the Millennials in higher education learn very differently than their predecessors.
Purpose: Our study provides comparisons on three learning parameters of learning affectivity, goal orientation and competition between Gen X & Millennials..
Methods: To study whether the learning attributes are similar or they differ across the two generations we compared the means of the three attributes under consideration. Results: We find Millennials to be different from Gen X across the three studied parameters suggesting that teaching pedagogies require a rethink for Millennials.
Conclusions: These results could be useful in designing appropriate teaching pedagogies that are likely to improve Millennials’ learning.
AISHE (2020), AISHE Report 2018-19, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Accessed from https://aishe.gov.in/aishe/home on August 30th, 2021
Alexander C.S., Sysko J.M. (2013). I’m Gen Y, I Love Feeling Entitled, and It Shows. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(4), 127-131.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.2061
Ames, C., Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.110
Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., Gonçalves, R., Martins, J., & Branco, F. (2018). The social impact of technology on Millennials and consequences for higher education and leadership.
Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 954-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.007
Baldwin, T. T., Magjuka, R. J., &Loher, B. T. (1991). The perils of participation: Effects of choice of training on training motivation and learning. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 51-65.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00690.x
Beard, C., Clegg, S. and Smith, K. (2007). Acknowledging the affective in higher education, British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 235-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701208415
Beenen G. (2014). The Effects of Goal Orientations and Supervisor Concerns on MBA Intern Learning and Performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 82-101. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0006
Belenky D. M. &Nokes-Malach T. J. (2012) Motivation and Transfer: The Role of Mastery-Approach Goals in Preparation for Future Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(3), 399-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.651232
Bledow, R., Carette, B., Kühnel, J., &Bister, D. (2017). Learning from others’ failures: The effectiveness of failure stories for managerial learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0169
Box, J. F. (1981). Gosset, Fisher, and the t distribution. The American Statistician, 35(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1981.10479309
Chapman, J. R. and Rich, P. (2015), January. The Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Gamification Platform for Business Education. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 11477). Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.185
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Chung, S., Zhan, Y., Noe, R. A., & Jiang, K. (2021). Is it time to update and expand training motivation theory? A meta-analytic review of training motivation research in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000901
Clark C. S., Dobbins G. H., Ladd R. T. (1993). Exploratory field study of training motivation: Influence of involvement, credibility, and transfer climate. Group & Organization Management, 18, 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601193183003
Cogin, J. (2012). Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(11), 2268–2294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.610967
D’Amato, A., & Baruch, Y. (2020). Cultural and generational predictors of learning goal orientation: A multilevel analysis of managers across 20 countries. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(2), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595820926218
De Lange P., Suwardy T., Mavondo F. (2003). Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: determinants of student motivation. Accounting Education, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928032000064567
Deterding S., Sicart M., Nacke L., O’Hara K., Dixon D. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, Finland. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Deutsch M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204
Dweck, C. S. and Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Elliot A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168
Erhel S., Jamet E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers and Education, 67, 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.019
Feiertag, J. and Berge, Z.L. (2008). Training Generation N: how educators should approach the Net Generation. Education+Training, 50(6), 457-464. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810901782
Gertsakis, N., Kroustallaki, D., &Sideridis, G. D. (2021). How do classroom goal structures matter? The impact on grammar achievement, perceived autonomy support, flow, and affect. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1694111
Gupta, P., & Goyal, P. (2018). Gen Y Attributes— Antecedents to Teaching Pedagogy. Vision, 22(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262917750248
Gursoy, D., Maier, T. A., & Chi, C. G. (2008). Generational differences: An examination of work values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. (3), 448-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.11.002
Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., &Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(C), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., &Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hershatter, A. and Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y
Hicks, W. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1987). Entry into training programs and its effects on training outcomes: A field experiment. Academy of management journal, 30(3), 542-552. https://doi.org/10.5465/256013
Hopkins, L., Hampton, B. S., Abbott, J. F., Buery-Joyner, S. D., Craig, L. B., Dalrymple, J. L., ... & Wolf, A. (2018). To the point: medical education, technology, and the millennial learner. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 218(2), 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.001
Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (2009). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage.
Jindal, V., & Jaiswall, M. (2015). Board diversity and firm performance influenced by ownership concentration: Evidence from India. Indian Institute of Management Calcutta Working Paper Series, WPS No. 765 July 2015.
Johnson D.W., & Johnson R. (1983). The socialization and achievement crisis: Are cooperative learning experiences the solution? in L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual 4, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 119–164.
Johnson, S.A. and Romanello, M.L. (2005). Generational diversity: Teaching and learning approaches. Nurse educator, 30(5), 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-20050900000009
Jonas-Dwyer, D. and Pospisil, R. (2004). The millennial effect: Implications for academic development. In Proceedings of the 2004 annual international conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) (pp. 356-366).
Kozlowski S. W., Bell B. S. (2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 900–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.900
Lee F., Sheldon K. M., Turban D. E. (2003). Personality and the goal-striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.256
Lee, H. W. (2019). Moderators of the motivational effects of performance management: A comprehensive exploration based on expectancy theory. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018783003
Linnenbrink E. A., Pintrich P. R. (2002). Achievement goals theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 27(2), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_2
Linnenbrink E. A. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. In P.A. & P. Reinhard (eds.), Emotion in Education, San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50008-3
Mathieu J. E., Tannenbaum S. I., Salas E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 828-847. https://doi.org/10.2307/256317
Mehta, R. (2020). Gender-based differences in consumer decision-making styles: implications for marketers. Decision 47(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00252-8
Noe R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736-749. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283922
Nunnally J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers gen-xers Millennials. EDUCAUSE review, 500(4), 37-47.
Pelton L. E., True S. L. (2004). Teaching Business Ethics, Why Millennials? Marketing Education Review, 14, 6370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2004.11488879
Prensky M. (2001). Digital game based learning, New York: McGraw Hill. Putz, L. M., Hofbauer, F., &Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Can gamification help to improve education? Findings from a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106392
Raines, C. (2002). Managing Millennials. Connecting Generations: The Sourcebook. Reeves, T. C., & Oh, E. (2008). Generational differences. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3, 295-303.
Reilly, P. (2012). Understanding and Teaching Generation Y. In English teaching forum (Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 2-11). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5, 2200 C Street NW 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20037.
Sojka J. Z., Fish M. S. B. (2013). Brief In-Class Role Plays: An Experiential Teaching Tool Targeted To Generation Y Students. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2008.11489021
Stukalina Y. (2014). Identifying Predictors of Student Satisfaction And Student Motivation In The Framework Of Assuring Quality In The Delivery Of Higher Education Services. Business, Management and Education, 12(1), 127-37. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2014.09
Tannenbaum S. I., Mathieu J. E., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759-769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.759
Tetteh G. A. (2015). Assessing indicators of motivation for learning in a TQM class. TQM Journal, 27(4), 412-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2015-0037
Urdan, T., & Kaplan, A. (2020). The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101862
Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 44(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
Warmelink, H., Koivisto, J., Mayer, I., Vesa, M., & Hamari, J. (2020). Gamification of production and logistics operations: Status quo and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 106, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.09.011
Weiner, B. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action, Guilford Press. Yahr, M. A., & Schimmel, K. (2013). Comparing Current Students to a Pre-Millennial Generation: Are They Really Different?Research in Higher Education Journal, 20.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
Zaphiris P., Ang C. S., Law D. (2007). Individualistic Versus Competitive Game-Based E-Learning. Advanced Technology for Learning, 4(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.208.2007.4.208-0921
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Issues and Ideas in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in Journal of Issues and Ideas in Education (Issues Ideas Educ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://iie.chitkara.edu.in. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.
View Legal Code of the above mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
|Journal of Issues and Ideas in Education by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://iie.chitkara.edu.in