CS

Content Teachers’ Written Comments on Their Life-long English Language Profiles

Francesca Costa

  • Download PDF
  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2017.52009
KEYWORDS

CLIL, identity, linguistic profiles

PUBLISHED DATE
PUBLISHER
ABSTRACT

CLIL in Italy has been compulsory by law since 2003 (Moratti’s Law) for the last year of all secondary schools. Subject-matter teachers were chosen to be the CLIL teachers, and only in 2012 did methodological and linguistic training begin (provided by universities all over the country). This study explores the profile of content teachers attending CLIL training not in terms of their linguistic competence but in terms of their relationship with English as an additional language. To do so, 115 trainees were asked to fill in a questionnaire composed of 10 open-ended questions and 2 close-ended ones. This questionnaire had both a research and training goal, since it was submitted at the beginning of the training course to investigate content teachers’ perceived linguistic profiles, which served as a psychological and pedagogical starting point for the course. Results show that content teachers have a specific linguistic identity and have had similar past experiences with the English language. These results could have repercussions and be exported to other training programmes, especially in terms of shifting teachers’ personae from subject-matter to fully-fledged CLIL teachers.

Page(s)
URL http://dspace.chitkara.edu.in/jspui/bitstream/1/907/2/52009_IIE_Francesca%20Cost.pdf
ISSN
DOI https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2017.52009
REFERENCES
  • Aiello, J., Di Martino, E., & Di Sabato, B. (2015). Preparing Teachers in Italy for CLIL: Reflections on Assessment, Language Proficiency and Willingness to Communicate. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1041873
  • Bonnet, A., & Breidbach S. (2017). CLIL Teachers’ Professionalization. Between Explicit Knowledge and Professional Identity. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.) Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 269–285.
  • Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. (2012). Balancing Content and Language in Instruction: The Experience of Immersion Teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 2, 251–269.
  • Costa, F. (2012) Focus on Form in ICLHE Lectures. Evidence from Englishmedium Science lectures by Native Speakers of Italian. AILAReview, 25, 30–47.
  • Costa, F. (2014) “Non sarò mai più il docente di prima”. L’identità dei docenti di discipline non linguistiche come apprendenti di lingua inglese. LEND, settembre, 1–8.
  • Dafouz, E., Huettner, J., & Smit, U. (2016). University Teachers’ Beliefs of Language and Content Integration in English-medium Education in Multilingual University Settings. In T. Nikula, E., Dafouz, P., Moore, U., Smit (Eds.) Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • D’Angelo L. (2013). The Construction of the CLIL Subject Teacher Identity. In S. Breidbach & B. Viebrock (Eds.) CLIL: Research, Policy and Practice. Peter Lang: Frankfürt.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Escobar Urmeneta, C. (2013). Learning to Become a CLIL Teacher: Teaching, Reflection and Professional Development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 3, 334–353.
  • Gillham, B. (2000) Case Study Research Methods. London: Continuum.
  • Huettner, J., Dalton-Puffer C., Smit, U. (2013). The Power of Beliefs: Lay Theories and Their Influence on the Implementation of CLIL Programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 3, 267–284.
  • Moate, J.M. (2011). The Impact of Foreign Language Mediated Teaching on Teachers’ Sense of Professional Integrity in the CLIL Classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 3, 333–346, DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2011.585023
  • Nikula, T. (2017). Emerging Themes, Future Research Directions. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.) Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 307–312.
  • Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P. & Smit, U. (2016). Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Sasajima, S. (2013). How CLIL Can Impact on EFL Teachers’ Mindsets about Teaching and Learning: An Exploratory Study on Teacher Cognition. International CLIL research Journal, vol. 2. 55–66.
  • Skinnari, K., & Bovellan, E. (2016). CLIL Teachers’ Beliefs about Integration and about Their Professional Roles: Perspectives from a European Context. In Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Viebrock B. (2013). The Situation in the CLIL Classroom is Quite Different – or is it? Teachers’ Mindsets, Methodological Competencies and Teaching Habits. In D. Marsh & O. Meyer (Eds) Quality Interfaces: Examining Evidence & Exploring Solutions in CLIL. EichstaettAcademic Press: Eichstaett.